US Elections and the 2025 Macro Narrative
After record-breaking spending and considerable drama, the US presidential elections is set to place tomorrow, 5 November. Along with picking a President and Vice President, Americans will also vote ...
Chief Investment Office - Hong Kong4 Nov 2024
  • This coin-toss election has polls suggesting leads and lags within the margin-of-error.
  • Regardless of the outcome of the elections, the US will remain a deeply divided nation.
  • High rates have not dented asset markets, which have been buoyed by strong corporate and household balance sheets, a major investment cycle around AI, and substantial fiscal support.
  • Stubborn services inflation, lack of fiscal consolidation, and weaponisation of the USD underscore major structural challenges ahead.
  • Tariffs against China and the rest of the world are expected to rise under Trump and is not likely to be reduced under Harris.
Article image
Photo credit: Unsplash
Read More

After record-breaking spending and considerable drama, the US presidential elections is set to place tomorrow, 5 November. Along with picking a President and Vice President, Americans will also vote on a range of other bodies, including the US Senate, House, state governorships, and state legislatures.

This is a coin-toss election, with polls suggesting leads and lags within the margin-of-error. But given the vagaries of the electoral college system, the ultimate verdict need not be narrow. All seven swing states could end of up going in one direction, however narrowly, thus giving the winner the veneer of a landslide. Regardless of the outcome of the elections, the US will remain a deeply divided nation on its choice of leadership. Lack of consensus on immigration, tax policy, entitlements, public debt, immigration, education, healthcare, and foreign policy will remain the hallmark of a United States under either Harris or Trump.

The elections are taking place at calm economic times, unlike four years ago when pandemic related distortion and uncertainty clouded the horizon. This time, the economy is maintaining a strong growth momentum despite a multi-year monetary policy tightening cycle. High rates have not dented the asset markets, which have been buoyed by strong corporate and household balance sheets, a major investment cycle around AI, and substantial fiscal support. Goods inflation has dissipated, while numerous geopolitical risks have come and gone without hurting domestic activities or sentiment.

The president taking office on January 20 next year will not be able to rest easy though, as behind the cyclical comfort lies major structural challenges. The fiscal situation, characterised by net public debt amounting to over 100% of GDP and USD1tn+ in annual interest payments, is increasingly untenable. Foreign investors’ inclination to hold US treasury as the world’s premier AAA-rated asset runs deep, but it is not unconditional. Stubborn services inflation, lack of fiscal consolidation, weaponisation of the USD, all are a source of rising discomfort, something that would need to be addressed sooner than later.

The US, over the past eight years, has made a decisive switch from promoting free trade to resorting to increasingly protectionist policies. Tariffs against China, in particular, and the rest of the world in general, would rise under Trump, but they won’t be reduced under Harris either. Restriction on China’s access to high tech continues to ratchet up, with those who trade with China also facing scrutiny; we expect no reprieve to this dynamic under either president in the coming years.

On USD and rates, would the outlook be different under the marginally more rules-based policy of Harris as opposed to the transactional and mercurial Trump? Perhaps one can make the case that Trump’s policies of tax cuts and tariffs would be more inflationary; but it is also not the case that Harris has major anti-inflation plans in her arsenal. Are rates likely to be higher as fiscal issues are left unaddressed? We think that’s true for both.

Social cleavages run deep along partisan lines in the US. But having assessed the last two electoral cycles, we suspect that lack of clarity on economic policies is bipartisan.

Topic

Disclaimers and Important Notices

The information published by DBS Bank Ltd. (company registration no.: 196800306E) (“DBS”) is for information only. It is based on information or opinions obtained from sources believed to be reliable (but which have not been independently verified by DBS, its related companies and affiliates (“DBS Group”)) and to the maximum extent permitted by law, DBS Group does not make any representation or warranty (express or implied) as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions and estimates are subject to change without notice. The publication and distribution of the information does not constitute nor does it imply any form of endorsement by DBS Group of any person, entity, services or products described or appearing in the information. Any past performance, projection, forecast or simulation of results is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of any investment or securities. Foreign exchange transactions involve risks. You should note that fluctuations in foreign exchange rates may result in losses. You may wish to seek your own independent financial, tax, or legal advice or make such independent investigations as you consider necessary or appropriate.

The information published is not and does not constitute or form part of any offer, recommendation, invitation or solicitation to subscribe to or to enter into any transaction; nor is it calculated to invite, nor does it permit the making of offers to the public to subscribe to or enter into any transaction in any jurisdiction or country in which such offer, recommendation, invitation or solicitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer, recommendation, invitation or solicitation or where such offer, recommendation, invitation or solicitation would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject DBS Group to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country, and should not be viewed as such. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, the information, services or products described or appearing in the information are not specifically intended for or specifically targeted at the public in any specific jurisdiction.

The information is the property of DBS and is protected by applicable intellectual property laws. No reproduction, transmission, sale, distribution, publication, broadcast, circulation, modification, dissemination, or commercial exploitation such information in any manner (including electronic, print or other media now known or hereafter developed) is permitted.

DBS Group and its respective directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, and may effect transactions in securities mentioned and may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking and other banking or financial services to any persons or entities mentioned.

To the maximum extent permitted by law, DBS Group accepts no liability for any losses or damages (including direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental or loss of profits) of any kind arising from or in connection with any reliance and/or use of the information (including any error, omission or misstatement, negligent or otherwise) or further communication, even if DBS Group has been advised of the possibility thereof.

The information is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. The information is distributed (a) in Singapore, by DBS Bank Ltd.; (b) in China, by DBS Bank (China) Ltd; (c) in Hong Kong, by DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited; (d) in Taiwan, by DBS Bank (Taiwan) Ltd; (e) in Indonesia, by PT DBS Indonesia; and (f) in India, by DBS Bank Ltd, Mumbai Branch.